What was missing from Alaskan art? Why didn’t it seem to be, well, Great Art like the kind that I drool over in museums around the country? A recent debate in the local arts scene is starting to illuminate what I could never exactly put my finger on. It’s missing a noble soul.
A few editors of a local humanities independent newsletter put out a survey that rocked several art organizations in town. It asked what their objective standards were for “high” art, for morally and spiritually good art. The few answers they got back stuttered with objections to even being asked such a question. The Anchorage Daily News reported on their reaction May 7 in “Artists, presenters bristle at idea of ‘objective standards.’ They also grilled the editors on why they would even want to give out such a survey. Like who died and made them Judge of Good Art, was the attitude I got from the piece. Anyways, look at this moral relativism quoted in the article:
“Trying to create objective standards is not about morality,” added Jay Brause, Dugan’s partner in life and Out North. “There’s a word for it, and it’s called ‘fascism.’ It’s the idea we should be of one body and one mind.”
This attitude was sung out by a singer/songwriter I saw last night, on a free ticket thank goodness. Cheryl Wheeler came out on stage, making no effort to say beautiful things, or to look feminine, or healthy. She sang some pretty lines but the rung hollow to my ears after she started to berate the Religious Right as if it were an evil monster. She spent a large part of the concert defending her lesbian relationship. I couldn’t trust that she was trying to strike a chord (ha, sorry) with something hopeful in the human soul. To my shame, I simply lowered my eyes when she asked supporters of the president and the relgious right to make themselves known. I flunked that test of bravery and am determined to do otherwise next time.
It just makes me desire all the more to keep playing guitar, and writing songs, and shout to everyone (in a pretty, feminine way of course) that there is something good enough that it’s worth dying for. It’s worth having hope in right and wrong, and waiting for true love. That art can show a glimpse of God’s goodness and that good and noble things should be meditated on (phillipians 4?.)
The humanity editors thought likewise.
Davidson: One of the things that was apparent as we went to these art houses is that most of the people involved in art are sensitive, caring people who have an acute sense of the aesthetic. But the irony is that there would be reluctance or outright failure or resistance to apply spiritual values to a process of evaluating or choosing art. It was as if it were a taboo, an unspoken line that was not to be crossed; these kind of moral, spiritual, ethical values were not to be used in the evaluation process.
So now the lines of the fight on delinated. Beauty’s beast seems to be those who would have no one reign in their impulses.